I was very disappointed with the Bubble experiment yesterday at Haw River. I had had some reservations about the experiment from when we did it in class last week. I was having trouble justifying the use of this experiment in a classroom and specifically in second grade. I struggled to find a connection between this experiment and other things they are learning in second grade. It seemed like teaching them about surface tension was a superfluous task since the NCSCOS for second grade focuses on animals, weather, states of matter, and sound. I guess this could technically fall into states of matter, but I felt like it didn't connect to other things they might be learning. This may also come from me having no idea what they are studying in their particular classroom, but one lesson on surface tension interspersed with whatever else that might be learning seems random and disjointed.
I do, however, know that second graders love bubbles and that we are trying to engage the students and help instill a sense of excitement for learning science. I appreciated the way the bubble experiment took advantage of something they enjoy and attempted to teach them a scientific idea. After we tried this lesson last week, I asked around to see how my classmates were going to attempt to make this lesson meaningful to the students and what they expected them to take away. Many of them explained that they wanted to focus more on inquiry and prediction making than the actual scientific reasoning behind the experiment. I decided that I would try this method as well, since I couldn't be sure that the students would be able to connect to the "surface tension" idea. This is where I was most disappointed. I did not see the curiosity that I was hoping to see, and it was difficult to get them to make predictions. This could have been more related to behavior management than the actual experiment, but they were so ready to do the experiment that they didn't really care to slow down and listen to directions or think about what was going to happen. I'm afraid that once the experiment was over, they just left a huge mess for us to clean up and then forgot about it entirely.
I think what I learned most from this experiment, regardless of whether I found it to be an appropriate lesson or not, is that helping the students to take away something from science may be more difficult than I thought. Giving them a chance to inquire and explore and experiment does not mean that they get to do it all the way they want to. It has to be within the parameters that the teacher outlines for them. It is really a tricky way for them to do exactly what you want them to while making them believe they are learning for themselves. It is going to take a lot more practice for me to know how to set up those boundaries for them, and I am glad that I got to experience this Bubble experiment debacle. I think that I will be much more prepared for the next time around.
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I enjoyed reading about what you learned from the science activity because it is something that I did not necessarily think about, but something I definitely need to be prepared for. During my bubble activity, my students did pretty well with making predictions, but I can definitely see how sometimes they might not want to stop and take the time to do that. Just like you said, students will not always get to do an experiment the way they want to. I don't think it will work like that because they will need some guidance so they will get the lesson that we as teachers are wanting to teach them. I like how you said to make them believe that they are learning for themselves! I think it is great to give them opportunities to do this and to explore, while guiding them so that they can learn the lessons we want to teach them.
ReplyDeleteGreat thoughts!
Dear Anna (I'm pretending to be an old person who just learned to blog),
ReplyDeleteI'm sorry that classroom management got in the way of your students really embracing the experiment. I mentioned in my blog that I almost had the completely opposite experience. It amazes me how much of an influence the two have on one another.
You do have to take into account some of the circumstantial things that are nobody's fault. We essentially descended on their school in a pack of 35. So, naturally, the kids didn't know what to do. Also, we will never know if they were ability grouped or compatibility grouped or any other -ility grouped.
Sterling and I added some phenomenon to the presentation that we were pretty sure the students had seen. It seemed to work really well, and if you are interested, you are more than welcome to filch from us. We poured oil on top of water (the separation is surface tension), and we held water in a straw by putting our finger over the top (again, surface tension), and we added water to a cup to see how much could hover at the top before it overflowed. Just something to think about.
Love,
Megan